Showing posts with label TV project. Show all posts
Showing posts with label TV project. Show all posts

Friday, July 3, 2009

The Way We Live Now...

So, even though I'm still editing the VMI New Market project (using an usual system of editing video as a "silent movie" in essence first, then going back to the interviews to create a narration of sorts -- exactly the opposite of the usual method), I've already started filming on another project.


This is Phil Welch, a woodworker -- really an artist who works in wood -- here in Lexington. I first met him at a party, hosted by someone who had commissioned one of his works: a table in with, instead of conventional legs, a bumble bee's head and legs. It was a really impressive piece, in various tones of wood. In other words, no stain or paint, just different wood tones providing the color.

At the time, I thought that watching the creation of such a complicated piece -- not to mention the artistic effort that went into it -- would be really interesting. So I suggested to him that, next time he had a good commission to work on, he should let me know so I could film it from start to finish.

This is Phil's drawing for the commission he called me about: a large jewelry box in the shape of a woman. The final piece will be only slightly smaller than life size, with a torso serving as the box, about a foot-and-a-half or two feet tall. I guess the final piece will be about five feet tall. It will hang from brackets on a wall.

The drawings, as perhaps you can see here, are not really detailed diagrams, but more a way for him to work through ideas. Nothing is set until he really starts working the wood. However, wood being wood, as he has explained to me, once you commit to a certain shape and structure, you're pretty committed.

Here he shapes a leg. He rasps and sands the pieces like this by hand, slowly drawing the shape he wants out of the wood.

Phil's actually very humble about my film. He constantly wonders what it is that he's doing that might be interesting to watch, and constantly apologizes for, as he puts it, "not much happening" as I film. Meanwhile, I'm looking through the lens and watching him think and create ... long pauses as he stares at the wood, then rasps, then touches, then rasps again, then looks, steps back, steps in. It's really quite exciting in its way. If he only knew.

Also, I have to say he's a delight to interview; the absolute opposite of a bad interview. No question goes unanswered or inadequately considered. "What are you doing today?" might lead to an extended philosophical consideration of whether what he's doing should really be considered "art", or just "artisan" or maybe even plain old "work." Or it might just result in a review of his efforts. Usually both...

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Slapped in the face by technology...

So I read this AdAge story about how the CMO of Kodak, Jeffrey Hayzlett, uses Twitter a lot, and I happen to be beginning my experiment with Twitter (find me: EvansMcCan, for the documentary/photo work).  So I idly write, "Just started following Kodak's Jeffrey Hayzlett.  Wish I knew how to get his attention..." because we have been working on a project about White House press photography and its impact on the image of the President.  It's a perfect thing for Kodak to support (it's a documentary intended for public television), its a hot subject right now (after all, Damon Winter of The New York Times just won a Pulitzer for his pictures of the Obama campaign) and once, some time ago, we almost had them funding it.  It's just one of those matches that it's so, so ideal, so obvious, that it hurts.  And, frankly, as documentaries go, it's really cheap ... probably less than their ad agency paid for paper clips on the last campaign.

Anyway, I walk away from the computer (I don't have Twitter, or even texting really, on my phone yet) thinking no more of it, only to find a message when I return: "you got it, now what?"  Gak!  It's 4 hours old!  Gakgrgk!  So I answer, first forgetting I have only 140 characters and trying to outline the whole thing.  It dawns on me that only when I see "-240" in big red print on top.  

Man, this Twitter thing is something...