I seem to have an ever expanding list of websites that I want to point out or comment upon, and I keep putting off doing it because I try to do the collections all at once, or in a theme, but I think I need to just start doling these out as I get it done.
There is, for example, this warning about the inevitable creative and work plateau everyone will face.
"Society has a funny way of reminding people that there’s this order for things, and at this point your Facebook wall is exploding with friends’ puppies and houses and engagements and marriages and babies. And you start asking yourself… what have you done with your life?!"
Next, I'm always amused by and interested in a blog post that gets your attention cleverly, and delivers by being more clever, like this one.
"Let’s do some math," Etienne Schottel writes. "What can we get for $2,800 (which is quite something I must admit)?
"A) The Sony RX1 killer-camera-that-fits-in-your-pocket-alas-not-in-my-French-undersized-pockets. ...
"B) A Leica lens which is so sharp that it is considered as a weapon in some countries.
"C) A one-year flight ticket which will offer you so many good moments and pictures that you’ll never regret it.
"Yes, my answer is C. This is the price of the ticket (for one person) we paid for our one-year trip. But, you can change the amount for something smaller, even $300 my answer remains “C”. I will always prefer using my money to go somewhere I don’t know that any new camera and that is my Grail. Period (I love them)."
Good point, in its way. As I've blogged a couple times before, and mentioned on The Guy with the Leica, truly the best camera is the one you have, and having something decent while in an interesting place is a good combination.
But maybe not a great one.
I think he misses two points: That the camera used can affect the picture, and there are pictures everywhere.
I have blogged before about my love of the Leica M and in particular the ones I own. As I've said before, the M style camera just makes me see things differently, basically with more awareness. Another, more esoteric way I have put it: The M makes it clear to me what a 50mm lens is for.
However, what's more important, I think, is the idea of putting your head in the right place to shoot. Why is it that things are more interesting and somehow more visual when you're traveling? Why is a small Chinese child in Beijing photogenic, but your neighbor's toddler cute, but just another kid? Try looking at your world as a visitor. It might actually surprise you what you now see and what becomes interesting.
Finally, there's this cri de coeur by a wedding photographer. She relates how she made herself crazy looking at other photographers' work, but then just stopped cold turkey.
"Instead? I read books. I listened to music. I drank whiskey with my friends and had impromptu dance parties in my living room. I binge-watched TV shows and ate entire boxes of doughnuts. I took road trips, stayed up all night, slept in all day. I snuggled my husband, my sisters, my nephews. I wrote and drew and sewed and took pictures with my iPhone — my iPhone, for heaven’s sake!
"In short: I lived. And I discovered that if I would just live my life and be a person, if I would commune with other people who live and love and ARE, inspiration grew. It blossomed out of me like herbs in the windowsill, taller overnight, greener by the hour.
"And instead of incessantly reminding myself of all the ways in which I fell short — the money I wasn’t earning, the gear I wasn’t acquiring, the pictures I didn’t even know how to make — I stepped back and saw that wedding photography — this beautiful, terrible, exhausting, wonderful thing I called my job — was really a direct path to communion."
It's a good lesson, I think, for all of us. We became what we are, and became good at what we do, not because of imitation, but because of us and all the learning and studying and various influences of all the things that interest us. You don't have to "find your joy," it's right there, where you put it down.
