I've got to agree with some commentators that, tempting though it is, the current fascination of both open liberals and some "legitimate journalists" (put in quotes, because I'm not sure what exactly those two words are meant to mean in conjunction, sort of like "social justice") to make snotty comments about the Tea Parties last week -- particularly comments related to certain sexual activities and their slang names -- is not really commentary and is just an indication of a willingness to not take a serious thing seriously. Would they dare make similarly dismissive and "humorous" comments about some of the wackier Islamic extremist terms?
Anyway, there was a Tea Party here in Lexington, Virginia, in the small park that sits in the center of town, attended, by my guess, by 100 to 150 people.
Here we look out into the town from the pergola in the park, past the speaker. 
Here we look back toward the pergola, visible in the background. As you can see, it was a cool and drizzly day.
After the evening rally (from 6 to 7 pm), people lined up to sign letters to their congressman and senators.
I know I announced at the beginning of this blog that I wouldn't do politics, and I like to think I'm not doing that here, but a hundred people in a town of just 7,000, with a social scene dominated in many ways by two college faculties, turned out on a cold rainy evening to make a statement against an otherwise popular president. This is something that deserves a reaction besides dismissive sarcasm...
POSTSCRIPT: An interesting comment today in the New York Times by David Carr, simultaneously doling out scorn to cable news for ginning up the Tea Party phenomenon and noting interest in the symbolic connection to history. Who would have guessed an event in today's shallow culture would still use the resonance of an historical event to inspire it?
No comments:
Post a Comment